NLNetfound
/
dsendcomm
2
2
Fork 0
Code Issues 82 Pull Requests 0 Releases 5 Wiki Activity
Labels Milestones
New Issue

#62 Request a wireless design review

Closed
opened 3 years ago by Michael Schloh von Bennewitz · 1 comments
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz commented 3 years ago

Request a wireless design review

Problem environment

Electronics manufacturers offer design review services, which can be taken advantage of in order to increase quality.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Log in to Microchip support account
  2. Create a request type Value Added Services
  3. Select a review type Wireless Review

Expected result

A Microchip engineer delivers review information after 12-15 days.

Workaround

Follow the suggested steps on the manufacturer website titled Ready to get started?

Severity level

This is low priority because we expect a rejection due to our choice of Opensource tooling.

# Request a wireless design review ## Problem environment Electronics manufacturers offer design review services, which can be taken advantage of in order to increase quality. ## Steps to reproduce 1. Log in to Microchip support account 2. Create a request type *Value Added Services* 3. Select a review type *Wireless Review* ## Expected result A Microchip engineer delivers review information after 12-15 days. ## Workaround Follow the [suggested steps](https://www.microchip.com/en-us/support/design-help/design-check-services/) on the manufacturer website titled **Ready to get started?** ## Severity level This is **low priority** because we expect a rejection due to our choice of Opensource tooling.
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz added the
question
label 3 years ago
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz added the
help wanted
label 3 years ago
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz added this to the Renewed dialog with vendors milestone 3 years ago
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz commented 3 years ago
Owner

The design review yielded suggestions that are partly implemented in 1c8ea48. The flaws found (for example USB differential data pairs, avoiding vias in RF, or balancing impedence and maintaining fifty ohm loads) are too severe to implement.

The design review yielded suggestions that are partly implemented in 1c8ea48. The flaws found (for example USB differential data pairs, avoiding vias in RF, or balancing impedence and maintaining fifty ohm loads) are too severe to implement.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something is not working derivative
Regarding a derived product duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists enhancement
New feature help wanted
Need some help invalid
Something is wrong question
More information is needed wontfix
This won't be fixed
No Label
bug
derivative
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No Milestone
Renewed dialog with vendors
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch '%!s(MISSING)'

Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?

No
Yes