NLNetfound
/
dsendcomm
2
2
Fork 0
Code Issues 82 Pull-Requests 0 Releases 5 Wiki Aktivität
Label Meilensteine
Neues Issue

#61 Request a MCU design review

Geschlossen
vor 4 Jahren von Michael Schloh von Bennewitz geöffnet · 1 Kommentare
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz hat vor 4 Jahren kommentiert

Request a MCU design review

Problem environment

Electronics manufacturers offer design review services, which can be taken advantage of in order to increase quality.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Log in to Microchip support account
  2. Create a request type Value Added Services
  3. Select a review type MCU32Check Review

Expected result

A Microchip engineer delivers review information after 12-15 days.

Workaround

Follow the suggested steps on the manufacturer website titled Ready to get started?

Severity level

This is low priority because we expect a rejection due to our choice of Opensource tooling.

# Request a MCU design review ## Problem environment Electronics manufacturers offer design review services, which can be taken advantage of in order to increase quality. ## Steps to reproduce 1. Log in to Microchip support account 2. Create a request type *Value Added Services* 3. Select a review type *MCU32Check Review* ## Expected result A Microchip engineer delivers review information after 12-15 days. ## Workaround Follow the [suggested steps](https://www.microchip.com/en-us/support/design-help/design-check-services/) on the manufacturer website titled **Ready to get started?** ## Severity level This is **low priority** because we expect a rejection due to our choice of Opensource tooling.
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz fügte das
question
Label vor 4 Jahren hinzu
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz fügte das
help wanted
Label vor 4 Jahren hinzu
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz hat diesen Issue vor 4 Jahren zum Renewed dialog with vendors Meilenstein hinzugefügt
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz hat vor 4 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer

The design review yielded suggestions that are partly implemented in 1c8ea48. The flaws found (for example USB differential data pairs, avoiding vias in RF, or balancing impedence and maintaining fifty ohm loads) are too severe to implement.

The design review yielded suggestions that are partly implemented in 1c8ea48. The flaws found (for example USB differential data pairs, avoiding vias in RF, or balancing impedence and maintaining fifty ohm loads) are too severe to implement.
Anmelden, um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen.
Keine Branch/Tag angegeben
Branches Tags
Label
Label entfernen
bug
Something is not working derivative
Regarding a derived product duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists enhancement
New feature help wanted
Need some help invalid
Something is wrong question
More information is needed wontfix
This won't be fixed
Kein Label
bug
derivative
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Meilenstein
Meilenstein entfernen
Kein Meilenstein
Renewed dialog with vendors
Zuständig
Zuständige entfernen
Niemand zuständig
1 Beteiligte
Fällig am

Kein Fälligkeitsdatum gesetzt.

Abhängigkeiten

Dieses Issue hat momentan keine Abhängigkeiten.

Verfassen Vorschau
Laden…
Abbrechen
Speichern
Hier gibt es bis jetzt noch keinen Inhalt.
Branch „%!s(MISSING)“ löschen

Das Löschen eines Branches ist permanent. Es KANN NICHT rückgängig gemacht werden. Fortfahren?

Abbrechen
Ja